Amgen Dismisses Regeneron Antitrust Lawsuit, Moves to Stay – Antitrust, EU Competition

To print this article, simply register or log in to

We previously reported on Regeneron’s antitrust lawsuit against Amgen in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Amgen recently filed a motion to dismiss Regeneron’s complaint and a motion to continue the lawsuit.

The lawsuit concerns Regeneron’s allegations that Amgen violated antitrust laws and “engaged in a persistent exclusion campaign to deny life-saving benefits to patients.”
[] Praluent® (alirocumab), Regeneron’s cholesterol-lowering drug. In its motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. 12(b)(6), Amgen alleges that, among other things, Amgen believes Amgen’s price cuts violate antitrust laws. “(1) It cannot be argued that the agreement between Amgen and ESI Part D and Optum Commercial is exclusive or de facto exclusive; and (2) the foreclosure is Only 15.27%, far from the 40% to 50% “substantial foreclosure” courts generally require. (3) fails to reasonably claim that the contract is of sufficient duration to be exclusive; (4) not claiming coercion; Amgen also said Regeneron’s antitrust claims violated antitrust laws “because Amgen does not claim to bundle his Repatha® with kickbacks for proprietary or market-dominant drugs.” claim is inadmissible. Because they are derivatives of antitrust claims.

Amgen is also moving to stay the litigation “until resolution of a patent litigation between Amgen and Regeneron involving the same drug at issue here” and is currently seeking Amgen’s waiver petition. Amgen is appearing in the Supreme Court on[i]In this case, Regeneron alleges that Amgen engaged in anti-competitive conduct by marketing its drug Repatha® in such a way as to keep Praluent® out of the market.[m]All of Regeneron’s claims relate to patent litigation, and as such, “If Amgen wins the patent litigation, Regeneron’s claims would be invalid.” and saves parties and non-parties costs and expenses that may prove unnecessary.”

We will continue to closely monitor developments in this matter.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide on the subject. You should seek professional advice for your particular situation.

Hot Articles: US Antitrust/Competition Laws

Digital Market Law—A New Era of “Big Tech”?

Deb Voice & Plimpton

The European Union (EU) hit a major milestone in July as part of its ongoing effort to transform the regulation of digital services within the bloc. EU Digital Market Act (DMA)…

Antitrust Section 101: “Most Favored Nation” Clause

Winston & Strawn LLP

“Most Favored Nation” (MFN) provisions have captured the attention of both government enforcement agencies and the business community. In particular, recent lawsuits regarding the use of MFN clauses…

Merger regulation comparison guide

Thalwa Thakor & Associates

Merger Management Comparison Guide for Indian Jurisdictions, Check Comparison Guide section to compare across multiple countries

Antitrust Enforcement Threats in Supply Chains

Foley & Lardner

With soaring inflation and constant disruption to supply chains for all kinds of commodities, the Biden administration is increasingly relying on antitrust officials to curb price increases and remove future bottlenecks.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *